EPFO: Take home a higher salary or contribute to PF? Understand the full arithmetic of the pros and cons before deciding..

Under the new labor codes, salaried employees can now choose to reduce their Provident Fund (EPF) contributions to increase their monthly "take-home salary." While the prospect of having more money in your bank account each month sounds appealing, it will directly impact your retirement corpus. If you do not invest the additional salary wisely, you could face a significant financial setback at the time of retirement. It is crucial to understand whether it is better for you to have PF deducted or to receive a higher monthly salary.

How will the new rule increase your take-home salary?
Sudhir Kaushik, CEO of Zaggle, explains that 12% of the basic salary is deposited into the EPF account. Under the old framework, many companies deducted PF based on the actual basic salary or capped it at the statutory wage ceiling of ₹15,000. This ensured a minimum contribution of ₹1,800 to the PF account. Under the new labor codes, the mandatory 12% contribution still applies only up to this ₹15,000 limit; PF deductions on salary amounts exceeding this limit are generally voluntary. Consequently, by reaching a mutual agreement with your company, you can limit your monthly PF contribution to ₹1,800, thereby directly increasing your take-home salary.

Which employees should not opt ​​for a higher salary?
According to Nisha Sanghvi, Director at Promore Fintech, this option of increasing one's salary is not beneficial for everyone. Certain employees should strictly avoid making this mistake:

Those who rely entirely on EPF for their retirement.
Those whose companies contribute 12% of the *entire* basic salary towards PF; reducing your contribution could lead to a corresponding reduction in the employer's contribution.

Employees over the age of 40, as they have fewer earning years remaining to build a retirement corpus. Those who lack a habit of saving or do not possess an emergency fund.

Employees who are apprehensive about stock market volatility. Currently, the EPF offers a secure, tax-free interest rate of 8.2%—a return that is difficult to find in other fixed-income options.

A small decision could cost you lakhs of rupees.
Let’s look at the numbers. Suppose an employee has a basic salary of ₹50,000. At a rate of 12%, ₹6,000 is deposited into their PF account every month. Under the new rule, if they decide to have only ₹1,800 deducted, their monthly in-hand salary would increase by ₹4,200. However, the long-term math is alarming. Had that same ₹4,200 continued to go into the PF, it would have built a substantial corpus of approximately ₹41–42 lakh over 25 years, assuming an interest rate of 8.25%.

Nisha Sanghvi points out that if the company also stops its voluntary contribution, the blow to the retirement corpus could double, potentially reaching around ₹80 lakh. There is also the tax angle to consider. An increase in take-home salary could raise your income tax liability, whereas money deposited in the PF is largely tax-free.

Who should consider reducing their PF contribution?
Financial experts believe that reducing PF contributions is prudent only under specific circumstances. If you are burdened by a high-interest loan (such as a personal loan) carrying rates of 12–14%, opting for a higher take-home salary to pay off the installments makes sense. Repaying a 14% interest loan is a better financial move than earning 8.25% interest on PF savings. Furthermore, this option is suitable only for disciplined employees who can invest their increased take-home salary in avenues that yield higher returns than the PF. If you cannot maintain discipline in your investments, then simply allowing the PF deduction to continue is the safest strategy for your future.

Disclaimer: This content has been sourced and edited from TV9. While we have made modifications for clarity and presentation, the original content belongs to its respective authors and website. We do not claim ownership of the content.