Bank must pay compensation if it blocks your debit card without notice: Consumer Court ruling..

Debit cards have become an essential part of daily life—whether for buying groceries, withdrawing cash, shopping online, or even accessing airport lounges. However, imagine stepping out for an important task or traveling, only to discover—while trying to make a payment or use an ATM—that your bank has blocked your debit card without any prior notice, even though your account remains active.

Such situations cause significant stress, and the experience is even more distressing when it happens while traveling. This is precisely what happened to a Federal Bank customer. The bank blocked his card without warning, leaving him and his family stranded at Kuwait International Airport, despite there being sufficient funds in his account.

What happened in this case?
The customer had held an account with Federal Bank since 2015. According to a *Times of India* report, he was using his international debit card while traveling from Kuwait to Kochi on September 2, 2021. When he attempted to access the airport lounge at Kuwait International Airport, the card failed to work. Attempts to use the card at airport shops were also unsuccessful. The issue persisted upon his arrival in Kochi, where the card was flagged as 'invalid' at a duty-free shop and subsequently at an ATM.

The customer later discovered that the bank had blocked his debit card and issued a new one without informing him. He alleged that the new card had remained lying at the bank branch for months, while he and his family suffered inconvenience during their international trip.

Consequently, he approached the Ernakulam District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in Kerala, alleging that the bank had blocked his debit card without any prior notice. In its order dated July 14, the Commission held the bank liable for deficiency in service and unfair trade practice for blocking the customer's international debit card without prior notification.

According to a 'ToI' report, the Commission directed Federal Bank to pay ₹1.25 lakh as compensation and legal costs. The Commission observed that while banks may block cards to prevent fraud, failing to inform customers beforehand constitutes a deficiency in service.

What was the bank's argument?
Federal Bank argued that the card was blocked after receiving an alert from Mastercard regarding a potential data leak associated with the customer's card. As a precautionary measure, the bank blocked the card and issued a replacement. The bank also stated that it had attempted to notify the customer via SMS, but the message could not be delivered due to technical reasons.

What did the Commission order?
The explanation provided to the Ernakulam District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission was not found to be credible. The Commission noted discrepancies in the bank's records regarding the timing of the Mastercard alert and the issuance of the replacement card. It held that while blocking a card to prevent fraud is lawful, the failure to inform the customer in advance amounts to an unfair trade practice and a deficiency in service. Consequently, the Commission ordered the bank to pay ₹1 lakh for the mental agony, harassment, and shock suffered by the customer and their family, along with ₹25,000 towards legal costs.

The Commission further directed that the payment be made within 45 days; failing this, the amount would attract an annual interest rate of 9% until the payment is made.

Disclaimer: This content has been sourced and edited from NDTV India. While we have made modifications for clarity and presentation, the original content belongs to its respective authors and website. We do not claim ownership of the content.