Will controversial chapters be removed from Delhi University's syllabus? Know what is the new proposal
Delhi University: It has been recommended to remove controversial religious and ideological chapters from the syllabus in Delhi University's PG course. The university administration is linking it to the well-being of the students, while differences are emerging among the teachers regarding this decision.
Delhi University: Delhi University (DU) is once again in the news regarding curriculum change. This time it has been recommended to remove some chapters of Political Science and History taught at the Post Graduate (PG) level of the university from the syllabus. The Standing Committee of the University has suggested removing some chapters which are considered religiously, ideologically or politically sensitive.
Which chapters are discussed?
The lessons in Political Science that have been recommended to be removed include:
Hindu Nationalism: A Reader - A book based on Hindu nationalism.
In the Belly of the River - Focused on Narmada movement and tribal rights.
Public Policy in South Asia – Mention of the alleged ‘Hinduisation’ of the tribals.
Routine Violence – Right-wing ideology and comments on Gandhi-Savarkar-Golwalkar.
The lessons that are being talked about being removed from the History subject are:
Sultan Among Hindu Kings – Discussion of Islamic influence in Vijayanagara.
The Rise of Islam and the Bengal Frontier – Based on the expansion of Islam in Bengal.
Subjects were removed earlier as well.
It is worth noting that in June 2025, DU also decided to remove the paper related to Pakistan, China and Islam from the syllabus from Global Politics. The university argued that these subjects could create ideological tension among the students.
What does the administration say?
The DU administration believes that these subjects can lead to a situation of dispute or conflict among the students. Therefore, these changes are necessary to maintain a positive academic environment.
Mixed reactions from teachers and students
The academic world seems to be divided into two factions regarding this proposal. Some teachers consider this an attack on academic freedom, while some believe that this will save students from mental pressure.
Final decision soon
At present, these recommendations are under consideration. A formal decision will be taken on this in the next meeting of the university.
