The controversy over the 'Pandit-related question' in the UP Police SI recruitment exam continues; will the UPPRPB award bonus marks to candidates?

UP Police SI Recruitment 2025: The written examination for the Uttar Pradesh Police Sub-Inspector (SI) recruitment drive of 2025 has concluded. The written exam was conducted on March 14 and 15 across 1,090 designated examination centers located in every district of the state. The examination was held in two shifts on both days, with over 1 million candidates participating. Although the written examination for the UP Police SI recruitment has concluded, the controversy surrounding the question involving the term "Pandit" continues to rage on. Consequently, candidates are left with numerous questions. They are eager to know whether they will be awarded bonus marks in compensation for this particular question.

In this context, let us delve into the details of the controversy surrounding the "Pandit" question in the UP Police SI recruitment examination. We will examine what decision, if any, has been taken regarding this specific question. Furthermore, we will explore the regulations established by the Uttar Pradesh Police Recruitment and Promotion Board (UPPRPB) regarding the compensation of candidates for any potential loss incurred in such instances.

The "Pandit" Question and the Controversy in UP Police SI Recruitment
The written examination for the Uttar Pradesh Police Sub-Inspector (SI) recruitment was conducted on March 14 and 15. During the examination held on March 14, a question was asked regarding the term "opportunist." Four options were provided as potential answers to this question, one of which included the term "Pandit." Subsequently, the controversy surrounding this matter deepened, triggering an uproar across the entire country. Adopting a stern stance on the issue, the Yogi government has issued directives to all Board Presidents and Chairpersons, strictly prohibiting the inclusion of any derogatory or inappropriate remarks concerning any individual, caste, or religion. It is widely believed that strict action may be initiated against those responsible for this lapse. All in all, the controversy persists.

Will the Question Be Scrapped? How Will Losses Be Compensated?
In the wake of these events, it is now widely anticipated that the Uttar Pradesh Police Recruitment and Promotion Board (UPPRPB) may decide to scrap this particular question. Although no final decision has been officially announced yet, the likelihood of the question being annulled appears to be increasing steadily in light of the escalating controversy. Now the question arises: what are the rules for compensating candidates for their losses in such a scenario? Will candidates be awarded bonus marks in exchange? Has such a situation occurred previously?

**Controversy Over 70 Questions in UP Police 2024 Recruitment**

A somewhat similar situation emerged during the UP Police Recruitment 2024, where a controversy arose regarding 70 questions. Although the dispute did not concern the options themselves, the answers provided for 41 questions were incorrect, while for another 29 questions, the options listed as correct were erroneous. In this matter, the UPPRPB decided in accordance with the ruling delivered by the Allahabad High Court in Writ Petition No. 2669/2009 (Pawan Kumar Agrahari vs. UPPSC).

**How ​​Marks Were Awarded for Cancelled Questions and Incorrect Answers**

In the UP Police Recruitment 2024, the UPPRPB cancelled 25 questions; the marks for these questions were awarded in accordance with the judgment pronounced by the Allahabad High Court in Writ Petition No. 2669/2009 (Pawan Kumar Agrahari vs. UPPSC). Under this judgment, marks for cancelled questions are awarded either to those candidates who had selected the correct answer or, alternatively, the marks are distributed proportionally among all candidates.

Disclaimer: This content has been sourced and edited from TV9. While we have made modifications for clarity and presentation, the original content belongs to its respective authors and website. We do not claim ownership of the content.